What is good running form?
In running, more so than in other sports, the opinions on proper technique vary, but there is a more or less unanimous take on what represents good form. That strange disconnect between these two very connected things promotes erroneous ideas and further confusion since it takes correct technique to produce good form.
What are the normally accepted characteristics of a good running form? How are they described in conventional paradigm and why?
- Without muscle tension
- With quick legs turnover
- With short support time
- With almost silent landing
- With landing on a forefoot or flat foot
- With landing close to the vertical line going through the GCM
- With small vertical oscillation of the body
- With small upper body movement
- With slight forward lean or erect trunk position
- Without any vigorous arms or legs movement
- With a quiet and focused face
These kinds of descriptions come primarily from observation of elite runners and are based on some commonly accepted images of movement. What we have there is “this is how it looks like” without “this is how you do it”.
This case scenario is quite familiar to anybody who went through even a short time of training and racing in running. Yes, all characteristics are well known, but nevertheless remain inaccessible to most recreational and age group runners. A common opinion is: “there they are, and here we are”, separating “elites” and “us” as something completely different.
To accept this approach and consider a good running form as predetermined and belonging just to elites doesn’t make sense. A good running form is the result of learning the skill, but not something inherited from your birth. While we can accept the view that some people have more in their genes to learn quicker and better, it does not change the fact that everybody could and should learn a good running form. Obviously, it’s very difficult to even grasp the idea of what the form actually is by just looking at the list of items described above, to tell nothing of being able to learn it.
A descriptive approach lacks systematic explanation and instruction which is necessary in learning process and doesn’t give any real knowledge as to why it happens in this or that way.
So what is good running form? Yes, we got the idea in general, about a smooth, effortless, light, etc. movement of the runner, but this is what we see, it is not what we understand and can actually reproduce. So where do we start? How do we get there?
To learn more please view our entire program on YouTube >
There are things that are a matter of opinion and then there are those that are not. Presence of gravity is a scientific fact. When discussing proper, efficient technique and good form, we must consider gravity and take its effect on our movement into account.
Our form reflects our relationship with the environment, where gravity is the leading component, which basically determines everything we perceive.
Good form that is commonly perceived and described as smooth, light and effortless, is just a reflection of how in sync with gravity our movement is. That movement comes by way of proper technique. Proper technique is a technique that takes gravity into account as part of its structure. This is the real meaning of the term ‘proper’. If gravity is considered then heel striking, knee lifting, pushing off, toeing off, lengthening the stride and such are out of question.
You must log in to post a comment.